Saturday, June 24, 2006

1st Edition London Editor Muhammad Haque

AADHIKARonline Editor©Muhammad Haque London Saturday 24 June 2006

AADHIKARonline Editor© Muhammad Haque London Saturday 24 June 2006

AADHIKARonline


AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATON, London, UK. Publishing these editions in London in association with Khoodeelaar! the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area campaign against the CrossRail hole Bill [The ‘CrossRail Bill’ in the UK House of Commons as at Friday 23 June 2006]

The 1st edition 0915 Hrs GMT /1015 Hrs UK Saturday 24 June 2006

Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
E-mail AADHIKARonline HERE

AADHIKARoNLINE and KHOODEELAAR! Legal disclaimer updated at 1330 Hrs GMT on Thursday 22 June 2006






Khoodeelaar! Legal action programme – against Transport Secretary Douglas Alexander, London mayor Ken Livingstone, Tower Hamlets Council chief executive Christine Gilbert and four Tower Hamlets Councillors [amongst others] – the grounds summarised [Continuing the updates as published on Friday 23 January 2006]]



Coming here on Saturday 24 June 2006
THE MUHAMMAD HAQUE political commentary on the Blaired state of inner city London

  • Why Charlie Falconer is wrong to promote the criminal law lies that Tony Blair is so desperate to perpetuate
  • Is a tee-totalling ‘Charlie’ Kennedy a really proper and good alternative to Ming Campbell as a leader of Germaine Greer’s fantasy ‘ideal’ political party for Britain?
  • Why Crossrail-hole-plotting Tower Hamlets Council is not a model at all to be cited anywhere
  • Blair crime failings in Tower Hamlets – why Christine Gilbert is not a right appointment for OFSTED –
  • An in-depth examination of the ‘petitions’ to the Crossrail hole select committee





  • From the previous editions:

  • Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail Bill campaign news and updates here from 1530 Hrs GMT /1630 hrs UK Friday 23 June 2006


  • The Khoodeelaar! legal actions against Tower Hamlets Council’s Crossrail-hole-plot-inviting ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert will also include as co-defendants Owen Whalley and five councillors or former councillors. They are being accused in court of lying for Crossrail.

  • The Khoodeelaar! legal actions against Christine Gilbert have been threatened over a long time
    The reasons why the actual claims have not been filed in court so far are linked with the other 'procedures'. Now that those procedures are out of the way, in the main, the threatened legal actions can commence

    The ‘procedural’ factors that would have made court actions harder to mount would have included the ‘outcomes’ of the ‘petitions’ to the UK House of Commons select committee on the Crossrail Bill.
    With this week’s conclusion, effectively, of the presentations of the petitions from the main area of the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against CrossRail hole attacks out of the way, the way is almost clear for commencing the main series of court actions against the perpetrators of the CrossRail assault on our community

    The main claim in court against Christine Gilbert and her co-defendants will be that they lied for Crossrail and that they did so repeatedly despite being warned by both Khoodeelaar! and by named individuals in the East London inner city borough of Tower Hamlets.
    The lies are evidence in the fact that the Whitechapel Crossrail hole station was imposed on the borough by the lies of the Council as represented by Christine Gilbert in the executive position and by her cop-defendants in their respective executive and or political roles.
    Neither category of officeholder was entitled to lie. Neither was exempt or can be exempt from liability for lying.
    Contrary to the various myths that have been built by the Blairist regime to shield Christine Gilbert from due process and thereby to deny the people of the East End the service from our local ‘elected council’ to which we are entitled, Christine Gilbert has not been at all a good administrator for democracy.
    She has been a violator of democracy/
    And the reason why she has been able to be in post at all despite her being a violator of democracy, an abuser of the powers available to her by way of her being in the office of Chief Executive is to be found in the fact that the controlling clique that has been in place on the Council throughout the relevant times has been itself a touting unit for CrossRail assault in the East End.
    Consequently there has been no question of any auditing by the people let alone by any court of law of the malpractice, deceptions, illegalities, lying, deceptions perpetrated by the little clique on the Council of which she has been a member
    The Khoodeelaar! Court actions have been made unavoidable by the behaviour of the corrupt clique whose lying has now been exposed in their own boastful spins as carried in their own EAST END LIES.

    To be continued





  • The craze for alleged economy in commuter travelling time that has been promoted around Crossrail hole Bill adventure is a common factor in the calculations and strategies of Big Business liars who want to impose their constructionist projects on top of existing communities roads and lines and destroy them so long as the contacts bring Big Business the Big public money incomes. The craze is today being hyped in the Crossrail-hole-Bill crazy EVENING STANRD ‘newspaper5’ which is running its ‘WEST END EDITION’ with ‘LONDON TO GET 140 MPH BULLET TRAIN’. The plug is for a Japanese train manufacturing conglomerate and is about the speed of the railway link between Ashford in Kent and King’s Cross in London. Apparently the connection will cut joinery time by 40 minutes at the current rate. But the ’Bullet-train’ banality has been condemned [accurately] as a damp squib’ by TRAVELWATCH, one of many usually pro-capitalist, PRO-Big Business ‘passenger watchdogs’. Just as the crass CrossRail hole adventure has been based on the assumption that all the past 200 years of rail and public transport networks in London do not exist and that the crassrail project will transform London transport wise into something it will never become without destroying the people and the communities in the city, the over-dozing on the idea of Bullet train is being seen by all seasoned observes as yet another piece of irrational hype by irresponsible profit-seeking, looters of public money. Khoodeelaar! is doing a review of rail transport in London over the weekend. As a preparation for that, we are here publishing the front page hype for the Bullet train as carried in today’s London EVENING STANDARD> VIEW it HERE


    From the previous editions:

  • Corruption by Tower Hamlets Council’s collusion with ethnicity-linked 'community control' - Who beat up a recent mayor of Tower Hamlets Council this past week?







  • How accurate have the KHOODEELAAR! descriptions of the Crass CrossRail plan been? In the past 30 months, starting with the Muhammad Haque poetry against CrossRail written and published on the internet on 31 January 2004, and including the latest comments and commentaries about CrossRail, the Khoodeelaar! movement has introduced into the English language a whole new vocabulary. Crass-Rail is one of the words. CrossRail-hole-Bill is another multiple of the same campaigning genre. In the course of the commentaries, devised and published in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 area, words have been created to describe the absolute awfulness of the corruptly conceived project.
    At times, it has appeared that the words may have been a bit too extreme, far-fetched.
    So how to assess the appropriateness of those words and the moral status
    ascribed to each one in context? Who would be the arbiter of the usages and the possible abusage?
    We have a clue
    Of sorts
    We have the evidence of the proceedings of the Select committee on the ‘CrossRail Bill’ as appointed by the UK’s House of Commons.|
    The shocking truth is that the proceedings not only confirm every single thing we ever wrote and coined to expose the shallow CrossRail Bill but the proceedings reinforce the existing ones and cry out for more to be coined and devised….We go into some of those here shortly…





  • Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail-hole-inviting Tower Hamlets Council

    The Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Tower Hamlets Council, held at 6pm yesterday, 21 June 2006, was the latest of a series of comprehensive educational and constitutional events in defence of the community in Tower Hamlets from the many-sided attacks being mounted on the Borough by Big Business, city of London and their touts installed in the controlling clique on the Blairist Tower Hamlets council.
    The Khoodeelaar! demonstration issued the final legal Acton warnings against Council ‘chief executive’ |Christine Gilbert and a number named councillors.
    they are now being taken to court
    More details will be published here
    The court actions were delayed because of the meetings of the House of Commons ‘CrossRail bill’ select committee which until earlier this week, was still hearing parts of the remaining presentations of the arguments by a number of petitions concerning the devastating consequences against the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area of certain powers contained in the Crossrail Bill. All those petitioners have been either personally based in Tower Hamlets or have had substantial involvements in the community in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London e1 area.

    The Khoodeelaar! legal actions against Christine Gilbert will also include as co-defendants Owen Whalley and five councillors or former councillors. They are being accused in court of lying for Crossrail. The full texts of the claims in court will be posted here in the next day or two.. More reports on yesterday’s Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against tower Hamlets Council will be posted during the later hours of today Thursday 22 June 2006




    VIEW HERE the CURRENT KHOODEELAAR! position statements on various legal actions being taken or about to be taken by Khoodeelaar! And against the Crossrail assault on the East End of London. Also included is the latest summary of MUHAMMAD HAQUE’s commentary on the ‘British constitution’ and how that ‘constitution’ is not helpful to little people like the community under CrossRail attack in the East End of London